Friday, February 18, 2011

Chapter 8: 102-108

In the book Pasteur’s Quadrant, scientist Donald Stokes discusses the different motivations behind deciding to do scientific research. Stokes believes that the most rewarding research is that done “seeking to expand the frontiers of knowledge in connection with a pressing problem.” Stokes believed John Maynard Keynes’s research fit under this category. But as brilliant as Keynes was, he had a hard time communicating how his ideas worked. He cared more about getting results than making sure people understood his “science.” To bridge the gap between himself and other economists, he hired an “interpreter.” John Hicks worked brilliantly and was able to simplify Keynes’s ideas using mathematics in a paper titled “Mr. Keynes and the Classics.” Once Keynes’s ideas were simplified, they spread rapidly and spawned two new classifications of economists: Modernists and Keynesians. The author described Keynesians as doctors; they wanted to find a cure for the economic troubles of our country. Modernists believed economic understanding was “an end in itself” and that is wasn’t very applicable to the real world.

The section ends by talking about John Hicks's most memorable work, Value and Capital. In the book he is very firm on the idea of perfect competition. He believes that without assuming perfect competition, the general equilibrium theory wouldn't work the way that it is supposed to.

1 comment:

  1. A for Jane.

    Did Keynes really "hire" Hicks? Not at all ...

    The model that Hicks developed to interpret Keynes General Theory... was the IS-LM model that is in your Barro text.

    What Jane has missed here in her second paragraph is that Hicks thinks perfect competition is essential to general equilibrium analysis because - at that time - no one knew how to do the math if competition wasn't perfect.

    One thing that Warsh does not say, and probably should, is that this whole metaphor of policy-oriented economists as doctors or engineers presumes that economic systems are things that are easily managed. What if they aren't? What if the doctors' prescriptions make things worse? I'm not claiming that this is true, or even a serious concern, but it might be. I think Warsh has a blind spot there.

    Extra credit to the first person to post a follow-up comment to this one explaining what Warsh means by a Harley Street physician.

    Extra credit to the first person to post a follow-up comment to this one explaining what Warsh means by Keynes being an Edwardian.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.